Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 19-24, March 2008

Early Invasive Versus Conservative Management for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

  • Ti-Yi Huang
    • ,
  • Chin-Lon Lin

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, 2, Min-Sheng Road, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan

Received 24 May 2007; received in revised form 4 June 2007; accepted 13 June 2007.

Article Outline

Abstract 

There is debate about routine early invasive treatment compared with conservative treatment in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Current guidelines recommend an early invasive approach in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Over the past 10 years, there have been nine trials which randomized approximately 10,000 NSTE-ACS patients into an early invasive or conservative treatment strategy. In these trials, early invasive treatment was not associated with a reduction in mortality after 1 year of follow-up. However, early invasive treatment was associated with a borderline statistically significant reduction in the composite endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to conservative treatment. In addition, rehospitalization and refractory angina were less frequent in the early invasive strategy groups. Although the optimal timing of angiography and subsequent revascularization, if appropriate, remains controversial, we believe that for patients with NSTE-ACS, an early invasive strategy should be strongly considered during initial hospitalization in high-risk patients and in cases of medical therapy failure to reduce angina symptoms and rehospitalization, without increased risk of death or myocardial infarction. [Tzu Chi Med J 2008;20(1):19–24]

Keywords:  Conservative treatment strategy , Early invasive strategy , Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Hamm CW , Braunwald E . A classification of unstable angina revisited . Circulation . 2000;102:118–122
  2. Braunwald E , Antman EM , Beasley JW , et al.   ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina) . J Am Coll Cardiol . 2002;40:1366–1374
  3. Bertrand ME , Simoons ML , Fox KA , et al.   Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation . Eur Heart J . 2002;23:1809–1840
  4. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI-IIIB trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia . Circulation . 1994;89:1545–1556
  5. McCullough PA , O'Neill WW , Graham M , et al.   A prospective randomized trial of triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy: results of the medicine versus angiography in thrombolytic exclusion (MATE) trial . J Am Coll Cardiol . 1998;32:596–605
  6. Boden WE , O'Rourke RA , Crawford MH , et al.   Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative strategy. Vetrans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators . N Engl J Med . 1998;338:1785–1792
  7. Wallentin L , Largerqvist B , Husted S , Kontny F , Stahle E , Swahn E . Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomized trial. FRISC II investigators. Fast Revascularization during Instability in Coronary artery disease multicenter study . Lancet . 2000;356:9–16
  8. Michalis LK , Stroumbis CS , Pappas K , et al.   Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study) . Eur Heart J . 2000;21:1954–1959
  9. Cannon CP , Weintraub WS , Demopoulos LA , et al.   Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban . N Engl J Med . 2001;344:1879–1887
  10. Spacek R , Widimsky P , Straka Z , et al.   Value of first day angiography/angioplasty in evolving non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: open multicenter randomized trial. The VINO Study . Eur Heart J . 2002;23:230–238
  11. Fox KA , Poole-Wilson RA , Henderson RA , et al.   Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomized trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable Angina . Lancet . 2002;360:743–751
  12. Lagerqvist B , Husted S , Kontny F , et al.   A long-term perspective on the protective effects of an early invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease: two-year follow-up of the FRISC-II invasive study . J Am Coll Cardiol . 2002;40:1902–1914
  13. De Winter RJ , Windhausen F , Cornel JH , et al.   Early invasive versus selective invasive management for acute coronary syndromes . N Engl J Med . 2005;353:1095–1104
  14. Ottervanger JP , Armstrong P , Barnathan ES , et al.   Association of revascularization with low mortality in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, a report from GUSTO IV-ACS . Eur Heart J . 2004;25:1494–1501

PII: S1016-3190(08)60003-8

doi:10.1016/S1016-3190(08)60003-8

Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 19-24, March 2008

Article Tools