Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 112-118, June 2008

Quality Improvement of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Abdominal Hysterectomy in a Medical Center in Eastern Taiwan

  • Meng-Si Wu

      Affiliations

    • Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Tzong-Bor Sun

      Affiliations

    • Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, 707, Section 3, Chung-Yang Road, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Ming-Hwang Shyr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Yu-Chi Wei

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Tsung-Ying Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Tang-Yuan Chu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Yu-Huai Ho

      Affiliations

    • Department of Infectious Disease, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Lih-Shinn Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Infectious Disease, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan
    • Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan

Received 22 August 2007; received in revised form 31 October 2007; accepted 5 November 2007.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Objective

To prevent surgical site infections, we conducted the Breakthrough Quality Improvement Project to optimize antimicrobial prophylaxis for abdominal hysterectomy. The specific aims were to increase the proportion of patients who receive prophylactic antimicrobial therapy within 1 hour prior to incision and increase the proportion of patients whose prophylactic antimicrobial therapy is discontinued within 24 hours after the end time of surgery.

Materials and Methods

The Breakthrough model was introduced by the Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation. It consisted of experts' meetings, learning sections and action periods with Plan-Do-StudyAct cycles. The control group included 43 patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy and 29 patients were enrolled as the experimental group. Timing and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis, incidence of surgical site infection, and hospital and antibiotic costs were recorded.

Results

The patients who followed the recommendations had no surgical site infections within 30 days after the end of surgery. Prophylaxis administration within 1 hour prior to incision was significantly increased from 69.3% to 92.4%. Prophylaxis duration of less than 24 hours was significantly increased from 25% to 100%. The length of hospital stay, hospital costs and antibiotic costs were all reduced.

Conclusion

We successfully introduced the Breakthrough Project to improve the quality of medical care through antimicrobial prophylaxis. By applying this important management model, we were able to optimize the timing and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Our experience demonstrates that this is one of the choices for effectively dealing with quality of medical care issues.

Keywords:  Abdominal hysterectomy , Antibiotic prophylaxis , Breakthrough model , Quality of medical care , Taiwan Quality Indicator Project

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Emori TG , Gaynes RP . An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory . Clin Microbiol Rev . 1993;6:428–442
  2. Cruse P . Wound infection surveillance . Rev Infect Dis . 1981;3:734–737
  3. Cruse PJ , Foord R . The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds . Surg Clin North Am . 1980;60:27–40
  4. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists  . ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . Am J Health Syst Pharm . 1999;56:1839–1888
  5. Gaynes RP , Culver DH , Horan TC , Edwards JR , Richards C , Tolson JS . Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index . Clin Infect Dis . 2001;33(Suppl 2):S69–S67
  6. Azzam RA , Hamade NN . Major reasons to prescribe antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . Int Surg . 2003;88:105–108
  7. Rodolico G , Cavallaro V , Catania V , et al.   Short-term antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. The state of the art . Eur Surg Res . 1989;21(Suppl 1):1–5
  8. Kurz X , Mertens R , Ronveaux O . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery in Belgian hospitals: room for improvement . Eur J Surg . 1996;162:15–21
  9. Martin C . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: general concepts and clinical guidelines. French Study Group on Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery, French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 1994;15:463–471
  10. Waddell TK , Rotstein OD . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Committee on Antimicrobial Agents, Canadian Infectious Disease Society . CMAJ . 1994;151:925–931
  11. Widdison AL , Pope NR , Brown EM . Survey of guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . J Hosp Infect . 1993;25:199–205
  12. Sanderson PJ . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: microbiological factors . J Antimicrob Chemother . 1993;31(Suppl B):1–9
  13. Ronald AR . Pros and cons of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . Can J Surg . 1981;24:113–116
  14. DiPiro JT , Record KE , Schanzenbach KS , Bivins BA . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: Part 1 . Am J Hosp Pharm . 1981;38:320–334
  15. Nichols RL . Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis . Med Clin North Am . 1995;79:509–522
  16. McConkey SJ , L'Ecuyer PB , Murphy DM , Leet TL , Sundt TM , Fraser VJ . Results of a comprehensive infection control program for reducing surgicalsite infections in coronary artery bypass surgery . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 1999;20:533–538
  17. Lonner JH , Barrack R , Fitzgerald RH , Hanssen AD , Windsor ER . Infection in total knee arthroplasty: part I. Classification, prophylaxis, and diagnosis . Am J Orthop . 1999;28:530–535
  18. Hanssen AD , Osmon DR . The use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents during and after hip arthroplasty . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1999;(369):124–138
  19. Vaisbrud V , Raveh D , Schlesinger Y , Yinnon AM . Surveillance of antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical procedures . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 1999;20:610–613
  20. Silver A , Eichorn A , Kral J , et al.   Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures. The Antibiotic Prophylaxis Study Group . Am J Surg . 1996;171:548–552
  21. Gyssens IC , Geerligs IE , Nannini-Bergman MG , Knape JT , Hekster YA , van der Meer JW . Optimizing the timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: an intervention study . J Antimicrob Chemother . 1996;38:1–8
  22. Novelli A . Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: the role of pharmacokinetics . J Chemother . 1999;11:565–572
  23. O'Melia PD , Jones WN . Concurrent review of the duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery . Hosp Pharm . 1989;24:369–372
  24. Bratzler DW , Houck PM . Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project . Am J Surg . 2005;189:395–404
  25. Center for Performance Sciences  . International Quality Indicator Project Acute Care Implementation Manual . Elkridge: The Association of Maryland Hospitals and Health Systems; 2007;
  26. Culver DH , Horan TC , Gaynes RP , et al.   Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System . Am J Med . 1991;91:152S–157S
  27. Sanabria A , Dominguez LC , Valdivieso E , Gomez G . Prophylactic antibiotics for mesh inguinal hernioplasty: a meta-analysis . Ann Surg . 2007;245:392–396
  28. Mohri Y , Tonouchi H , Kobayashi M , Nakai K , Kusunoki M . Mie Surgical Infection Research Group. Randomized clinical trial of singleversus multipledose antimicrobial pro phylaxis in gastric cancer surgery . Br J Surg . 2007;94:683–688

PII: S1016-3190(08)60020-8

doi:10.1016/S1016-3190(08)60020-8

Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 112-118, June 2008