Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 310-316, December 2009

Effectiveness of Workflow Change for Improving the Timing of Prophylactic Antibiotics

  • Sung-Ching Pan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • ,
  • Hsiang-Chi Kung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • ,
  • Jou-Wei Lin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
    • ,
  • Szu-Min Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • ,
  • Shan-Chwen Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan

Received 31 July 2009; received in revised form 10 August 2009; accepted 1 September 2009.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Objective

Prophylactic antibiotics are effective in reducing surgical site infection, especially if administered with appropriate timing. However, the timing of administration in clinical practice is usually suboptimal. This study evaluated the effect of changing workflow to improve the timing and documentation of antibiotic administration.

Materials and Methods

In a 682-bed regional teaching hospital, the personnel in charge of prophylactic antibiotic administration were changed from ward nurses to operating room nurses and the time of antibiotic administration was recorded on the surgical nursing record starting on April 1, 2006. The effect of workflow change was measured by improvement in the timing of antibiotic administration after the intervention. Patient records were identified by a search of the hospital coding database. A case was defined by a principal or secondary procedure code for six types of surgeries: total hip replacement, total knee replacement, herniorrhaphy, thyroidectomy, hemorrhoidectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Patients receiving therapeutic antibiotics because of documented preoperative infections were excluded from the study. Appropriate timing was defined as prophylactic antibiotics administered within 2 hours before incision. Patient outcome was assessed by the incidence of surgical site infections.

Results

During the study period from May 1 to October 31, 2006, 178 patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were compared with 160 patients who had surgery before the intervention period (May 1 to October 31, 2005). A statistically significant improvement in the appropriate timing of administering prophylactic antibiotics was noted between the two periods (41.8% to 78.9%; OR = 5.199; p < 0.001; 95% CI = 3.213–8.413). The number of patients without documentation of timing of prophylaxis decreased significantly from 49.4% to 3.4% (OR = 0.036; p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.015–0.087).

Conclusion

The workflow change had a significant effect on improving the timing and documentation of prophylactic antibiotic administration.

Keywords:  Antibiotic prophylaxis , Intervention study , Surgical wound infection

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Burke JF . The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions . Surgery . 1961;50:161–168
  2. Classen DC , Evans RS , Pestotnik SL , et al.   The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection . N Engl J Med . 1992;326:281–286
  3. Silver A , Eichorn A , Kral J , et al.   Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures . Am J Surg . 1996;171:548–552
  4. Bratzler DW , Houck PM , Richards C , et al.   Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project . Arch Surg . 2005;140:174–182
  5. Pan SC , Sun HY , Lin JW , Lin C , Lai TS , Chang SC . Improvement of timing of antibiotic administration by using a prophylactic antibiotic record form . J Formos Med Assoc . 2008;107:218–224
  6. Tan JA , Naik VN , Lingard L . Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections . Qual Saf Health Care . 2006;15:32–38
  7. US Public Health Service  . International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision: Clinical Modification . 4th edition. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1991; Report PHS91—1260.
  8. Gaynes RP , Culver DH , Horan TC , et al.   Surgical site infection rates in the United States, 1992—1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index . Clin Infect Dis . 2001;33(Suppl 2):S69–S77
  9. Miles AA , Miles EM , Burke J . The value and duration of defense reactions of the skin to the primary lodgement of bacteria . Br J Exp Pathol . 1957;38:79–96
  10. Bernard HR , Cole WR . The prophylaxis of surgical infection: the effect of prophylactic antimicrobial drugs on the incidence of infection following potentially contaminated operations . Surgery . 1964;56:151–157
  11. Polk HC , Lopez-Mayor JF . Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention . Surgery . 1969;66:97–103
  12. Stone HH , Hooper CA , Kolb LD , et al.   Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary, and colonic surgery . Ann Surg . 1976;184:443–452
  13. Silver A , Eichorn A , Kral J , et al.   Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures . Am J Surg . 1996;171:548–552
  14. Bull AL , Russo PL , Friedman ND , et al.   Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: reporting from a statewide surveillance programme in Victoria, Australia . J Hosp Infect . 2006;63:140–147
  15. Schell JA , Bynum CG , Fortune GJ , et al.   Perioperative antibiotics in nonemergency bowel surgery: a quality improvement project . South Med J . 1998;91:900–908
  16. van Kasteren MEE , Mannien J , Kullberg BJ , et al.   Quality improvement of surgical prophylaxis in Dutch hospitals: evaluation of a multi-site intervention by time series analysis . J Antimicrob Chemother . 2005;56:1094–1102
  17. Cabana MD , Rand CS , Powe NR , et al.   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement . JAMA . 1999;282:1458–1465
  18. Chang FY , Chang SC , Chang KJ , et al.   Guidelines for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery in Taiwan . J Microbiol Immunol Infec . 2004;37:71–74
  19. Parker BM , Henderson JM , Vitagliano S , et al.   Six sigma methodology can be used to improve adherence for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery . Anesth Analg . 2007;104:140–146
  20. Webb AL , Flagg RL , Fink AS . Reducing surgical site infections through a multidisciplinary computerized process for preoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration . Am J Surg . 2006;192:663–668
  21. Kanter G , Connelly NR , Fitzgerald J . A system and process redesign to improve perioperative antibiotic administration . Anesth Analg . 2006;103:1517–1521
  22. Prado MA , Lima MP , Gomes IR , et al.   The implementation of a surgical antibiotic prophylaxis program: the pivotal contribution of the hospital pharmacy . Am J Infect Control . 2002;30:49–56

PII: S1016-3190(09)60061-6

doi:10.1016/S1016-3190(09)60061-6

Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 310-316, December 2009

Article Tools