Measurements of Intraocular Pressure with Tono-Pen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers in Subjects with Systemic Illness
Article Outline
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this preliminary study was to compare differences in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) between Tono-Pen tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in healthy individuals and those with coexisting illnesses.
Patients and Methods
This prospective study included 42 individuals who were further categorized into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 healthy individuals and group 2 contained 22 participants who had various systemic illnesses such as congestive heart failure, chronic bronchitis, uremia, liver cirrhosis and cerebral ischemia stroke. One eye of each of the 42 participants was randomly selected and the IOP was measured with the Tono-Pen and GAT. In addition, the central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL) and keratometric power (K) were measured in the same eyeball of each participant.
Results
There was no significant difference in the IOP values between the Tono-Pen and GAT in these two groups (p > 0.05). The average IOP values in the healthy individuals were 14.5 ± 3.5 and 13.7 ± 3.4 mmHg with the Tono-Pen and GAT, respectively. The IOP values in the subjects with coexisting systemic illnesses were 13.8 ± 2.9 and 13.1 ± 3.2 mmHg with the Tono-Pen and GAT, respectively. The IOP values were positively correlated with CCT with both the Tono-Pen (group 1, p = 0.042; group 2, p = 0.039) and GAT (group 1, p = 0.020; group 2, p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in the age of subjects, AL or K (p > 0.05) in these two groups.
Conclusion
In our preliminary study, the IOP values were positively correlated with the CCT with Tono-Pen tonometry and GAT in these two groups. The IOP values were not significantly different between the Tono-Pen and GAT in the subjects with systemic illness.
keywords: Corneal thickness , Intraocular pressure , Tonometer
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2002;43:1389–1392
- . Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) . Ophthalmology . 2001;108:1779–1788
- . Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study . Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol . 2005;243:763–767
- . Distribution and determinants of intraocular pressure in a normal pediatric population . J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2006;43:14–18
- . Intraocular pressure associations with refractive error and axial length in children . Br J Ophthalmol . 2004;88:5–7
- . The effect of corneal thickness and corneal curvature on pneumatonometer measurements . Curr Eye Res . 2002;25:107–112
- . Uber applanationstonometrie . Ophthalmologica . 1957;134:221–242
- . Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis . J Cataract Refract Surg . 2005;31:146–155
- . Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia . J Cataract Refract Surg . 1999;25:1344–1348
- . Intraocular pressure change after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) . Kaohsiung J Med Sci . 2005;21:149–152
PII: S1016-3190(10)60022-5
doi:10.1016/S1016-3190(10)60022-5
© 2007 Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
